Each dated duty of the EU AI Act and US state AI laws, quoted from the official text of each law.https://jesseahawkins.com/rules/en-ushttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ut-aipa/#d-ut-aipa-effectiverule:ut-aipa-effective:2024-05-01The chapter takes effect. It sets up the Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy and its learning laboratory program. The law’s words: “Chapter 72 Artificial Intelligence Policy Act (Effective 5/1/2024)” https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title13/Chapter72/13-72.htmlTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-in-forcerule:eu-in-force:2024-08-01The AI Act enters into force. Its duties apply from the later dates on this page. The law’s words: “Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 entered into force on 1 August 2024.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2026/1744/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-prohibitionsrule:eu-prohibitions:2025-02-02Chapters I and II apply: the AI literacy duty in Article 4 and the bans on prohibited AI practices in Article 5. The two bans that the Digital Omnibus on AI added apply later, from 2 December 2026. The law’s words: “Chapters I and II shall apply from 2 February 2025, with the exception of Article 5(1), first subparagraph, points (ba) and (bb), and Article 5(1a) and (1b) which shall apply from 2 December 2026” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2026/1744/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-gpairule:eu-gpai:2025-08-02Chapter V applies: the duties of providers of general-purpose AI models, including technical documentation and a public summary of training content. Notified bodies, governance and penalties apply too, except the fines of Article 101. The law’s words: “Chapter III Section 4, Chapter V, Chapter VII and Chapter XII and Article 78 shall apply from 2 August 2025, with the exception of Article 101” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ny-raise/#d-ny-raise-signedrule:ny-raise-signed:2025-12-19The Governor signs the RAISE Act as Chapter 699 of the Laws of 2025. The law’s words: “12/19/2025 SIGNED CHAP.699” https://nyassembly.gov/leg/?bn=S06953&term=2025Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ca-ab2013/#d-ca-ab2013-postingrule:ca-ab2013-posting:2026-01-01A developer must post documentation about the data used to train each generative AI system or service, released on or after January 1, 2022, that it makes available to Californians, and again before each later release or substantial change. The law’s words: “3111. On or before January 1, 2026, and before each time thereafter that a generative artificial intelligence system or service, or a substantial modification to a generative artificial intelligence system or service, released on or after January 1, 2022, is made publicly available to Californians for use” https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2013Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ca-cata/#d-ca-cata-2026-janrule:ca-cata-2026-jan:2026-01-01The first start date of the California AI Transparency Act. AB 853 moved it to August 2, 2026. The law’s words: “22757.6. This chapter shall become operative on January 1, 2026.” https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB942Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ca-tfaia/#d-ca-tfaia-effectiverule:ca-tfaia-effective:2026-01-01The Act takes effect. A large frontier developer must publish a frontier AI framework. Every frontier developer must publish a transparency report before it deploys a new or substantially modified frontier model, and must report critical safety incidents to the Office of Emergency Services within 15 days. The law’s words: “22757.10. This chapter shall be known as the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act.” https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/tx-traiga/#d-tx-traiga-effectiverule:tx-traiga-effective:2026-01-01The Act takes effect, with its bans on some AI uses, its disclosure duties for government entities and health care, and its sandbox program. The law’s words: “SECTION 1. This Act may be cited as the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act. … SECTION 10. This Act takes effect January 1, 2026.” https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/Text.aspx?LegSess=89R&Bill=HB149Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/co-ai/#d-co-ai-2026-februle:co-ai-2026-feb:2026-02-01The first start date of SB24-205's duties of reasonable care against algorithmic discrimination. SB25B-004 moved it to June 30, 2026. The law’s words: “On and after February 1, 2026, the act requires a developer of a high-risk artificial intelligence system (high-risk system) to use reasonable care to protect consumers from any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination” https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb24-205Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ny-raise/#d-ny-raise-amendedrule:ny-raise-amended:2026-03-27The Governor signs the chapter amendment, Chapter 96 of the Laws of 2026, which rewrites the article and sets the start date. The law’s words: “03/27/2026 SIGNED CHAP.96” https://nyassembly.gov/leg/?bn=S08828&term=2025Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/co-ai/#d-co-ai-2026-junrule:co-ai-2026-jun:2026-06-30The second start date of SB24-205's duties. SB26-189 then repealed and reenacted the law. Its developer duties start January 1, 2027. The law’s words: “The act extends the effective date of the requirements of Senate Bill 24-205 to June 30, 2026.” https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25b-004Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-omnibus-amendmentsrule:eu-omnibus-amendments:2026-07-27Articles 102 to 110 apply. They change other EU laws, such as the vehicle and aviation rules: rules made under those laws for AI safety components must take into account the AI Act's high-risk requirements. The law’s words: “Articles 102 to 110 shall apply from 27 July 2026.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2026/1744/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ca-cata/#d-ca-cata-operativerule:ca-cata-operative:2026-08-02The Act takes effect. A covered provider must offer a free disclosure verification tool. Where it is technically feasible, it must also put a hidden (latent) disclosure in image, video and audio content that its generative AI system makes or changes. The law’s words: “22757.6. This chapter shall become operative on August 2, 2026.” https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB853Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-generalrule:eu-general:2026-08-02The rest of the Act applies, apart from the high-risk duties of Chapter III, Sections 1 to 3. This includes the transparency duties of Article 50 and the fines on general-purpose AI model providers in Article 101. The law’s words: “This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. It shall apply from 2 August 2026.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-high-risk-annex-iii-2026rule:eu-high-risk-annex-iii-2026:2026-08-02The first date for the high-risk duties of Chapter III, Sections 1 to 3, for Annex III systems such as hiring and credit scoring. The Digital Omnibus on AI moved it to 2 December 2027. The law’s words: “the delayed availability of standards, common specifications, and alternative guidance and the delayed establishment of national competent authorities lead to challenges that jeopardise the effective entry into application of those obligations and that risk a significant increase in implementation costs in a way that does not justify maintaining their initial date of application, namely 2 August 2026.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2026/1744/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-sandboxes-2026rule:eu-sandboxes-2026:2026-08-02The first date for each Member State to have an AI regulatory sandbox in operation. The Digital Omnibus on AI moved it to 2 August 2027. The law’s words: “Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities establish at least one AI regulatory sandbox at national level, which shall be operational by 2 August 2026.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/tx-traiga/#d-tx-traiga-ag-siterule:tx-traiga-ag-site:2026-09-01The Attorney General must post the online form through which consumers can submit complaints under the Act. The law’s words: “SECTION 8. Not later than September 1, 2026, the attorney general shall post on the attorney general's Internet website the information and online mechanism required by Section 552.102, Business & Commerce Code, as added by this Act.” https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/Text.aspx?LegSess=89R&Bill=HB149Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ca-cata/#d-ca-cata-sb1000rule:ca-cata-sb1000:2026-09-30SB 1000 takes effect at once, as an urgency statute. It removes the user threshold from “covered provider” and renames the AI detection tool as a “disclosure verification tool”. It removes the duty to offer a visible disclosure, and adds to what the hidden disclosure must state. It delays the Act for assistive technology, and bars false claims that a system is assistive technology. The law’s words: “This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the California Constitution and shall go into immediate effect.” https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB1000Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-marking-legacyrule:eu-marking-legacy:2026-12-02Providers of systems that make synthetic audio, image, video or text, placed on the market before 2 August 2026, must mark their output as Article 50(2) requires. The law’s words: “Providers of AI systems, including general-purpose AI systems, generating synthetic audio, image, video or text content, that have been placed on the market before 2 August 2026 shall take the necessary steps in order to comply with Article 50(2) by 2 December 2026.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2026/1744/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-new-prohibitionsrule:eu-new-prohibitions:2026-12-02Two bans that the Digital Omnibus on AI added to Article 5 apply. They cover AI systems that make realistic sexual images, video or audio of an identifiable person without consent, and AI systems that make child sexual abuse material. A system is banned when that is its purpose, or when it can readily do so and lacks adequate safeguards. A deployer must not use a system for that purpose. The law’s words: “Chapters I and II shall apply from 2 February 2025, with the exception of Article 5(1), first subparagraph, points (ba) and (bb), and Article 5(1a) and (1b) which shall apply from 2 December 2026” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2026/1744/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ca-cata/#d-ca-cata-hosting-platformsrule:ca-cata-hosting-platforms:2027-01-01A hosting platform must not knowingly offer a generative AI system that does not place the disclosures the Act requires. The law’s words: “22757.3.2. (a) A GenAI system hosting platform shall not knowingly make available a GenAI system that does not place disclosures pursuant to Section 22757.3. (b) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2027.” https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB853Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ca-cata/#d-ca-cata-large-platformsrule:ca-cata-large-platforms:2027-01-01A large online platform must detect standard provenance data in content it distributes. It must show users what provenance data is available and let them inspect it. Where technically feasible, it must not knowingly remove that data. The law’s words: “22757.3.1. (a) A large online platform shall do all of the following: … (c) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2027.” https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB853Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ca-tfaia/#d-ca-tfaia-ag-reportrule:ca-tfaia-ag-report:2027-01-01The Attorney General starts a yearly report of anonymized, aggregated information about whistleblower reports from covered employees. The law’s words: “(d) (1) Beginning January 1, 2027, and annually thereafter, the Attorney General shall produce a report with anonymized and aggregated information about reports from covered employees” https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ca-tfaia/#d-ca-tfaia-cdt-reviewrule:ca-tfaia-cdt-review:2027-01-01The Department of Technology must review the Act's definitions of frontier model, frontier developer and large frontier developer each year, and recommend updates. The law’s words: “(a) On or before January 1, 2027, and annually thereafter, the Department of Technology shall assess recent evidence and developments relevant to the purposes of this chapter” https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ca-tfaia/#d-ca-tfaia-oes-reportrule:ca-tfaia-oes-report:2027-01-01The Office of Emergency Services starts a yearly report of anonymized, aggregated information about critical safety incidents. The law’s words: “(g) (1) Beginning January 1, 2027, and annually thereafter, the Office of Emergency Services shall produce a report with anonymized and aggregated information about critical safety incidents” https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/co-ai/#d-co-ai-2027rule:co-ai-2027:2027-01-01The reenacted law starts. A developer of a covered ADMT must give each deployer documentation of its intended uses, categories of training data, known limitations, and instructions for appropriate use and human review. The law’s words: “The act requires the developer of an ADMT (developer) that is used to materially influence a consequential decision (covered ADMT), starting January 1, 2027, to provide a deployer of a covered ADMT (deployer) with technical documentation” https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb26-189Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/co-ai/#d-co-ai-ag-rulesrule:co-ai-ag-rules:2027-01-01The Attorney General must adopt rules for the disclosure a deployer owes a consumer after an adverse outcome. The law’s words: “The attorney general must adopt rules to clarify these post-adverse outcome disclosure requirements by January 1, 2027.” https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb26-189Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ny-raise/#d-ny-raise-effectiverule:ny-raise-effective:2027-01-01The Act takes effect. A large frontier developer must publish a frontier AI framework and file a disclosure statement with the office. Every frontier developer must publish a transparency report before it deploys a new or substantially modified frontier model. It must also report each critical safety incident to the office within 72 hours after it determines, or has facts to reasonably believe, that the incident occurred. The law’s words: “§ 3. This act shall take effect [on the ninetieth day after it shall have become a law] January 1, 2027.” https://nyassembly.gov/leg/?bn=S08828&term=2025Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ut-aipa/#d-ut-aipa-repealrule:ut-aipa-repeal:2027-07-01The chapter is repealed. The law’s words: “(2) Title 13, Chapter 72, Artificial Intelligence Policy Act, is repealed July 1, 2027.” https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title63I/Chapter2/63I-2-S213.htmlTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-gpai-legacyrule:eu-gpai-legacy:2027-08-02Providers of general-purpose AI models placed on the market before 2 August 2025 must comply with the Act. The law’s words: “Providers of general-purpose AI models that have been placed on the market before 2 August 2025 shall take the necessary steps in order to comply with the obligations laid down in this Regulation by 2 August 2027.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-high-risk-annex-i-2027rule:eu-high-risk-annex-i-2027:2027-08-02The first date for the high-risk duties for AI systems that are safety components of products under Annex I, such as machinery and medical devices. The Digital Omnibus on AI moved it to 2 August 2028. The law’s words: “Article 6(1) and the corresponding obligations in this Regulation shall apply from 2 August 2027.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-sandboxesrule:eu-sandboxes:2027-08-02Each Member State must have at least one AI regulatory sandbox in operation. The law’s words: “Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities establish at least one AI regulatory sandbox at national level, which shall be operational by 2 August 2027.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2026/1744/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-high-risk-annex-iiirule:eu-high-risk-annex-iii:2027-12-02The high-risk duties of Chapter III, Sections 1 to 3, apply to Annex III systems, such as AI used in hiring, education, credit scoring and essential services. This includes risk management, data governance, technical documentation (Article 11 and Annex IV), logging and human oversight. The law’s words: “Chapter III, Sections 1, 2, and 3, with the exception of Article 6(5), shall apply from: … 2 December 2027 as regards AI systems classified as high-risk pursuant to Article 6(2) and Annex III” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2026/1744/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ca-cata/#d-ca-cata-capture-devicesrule:ca-cata-capture-devices:2028-01-01For each capture device it first makes for sale in California on or after this date, a maker must embed a hidden disclosure in captured content by default, and must let users choose to include one. This applies only where technically feasible and where it complies with widely adopted standards. The law’s words: “22757.3.3. (a) A capture device manufacturer shall, with respect to any capture device the capture device manufacturer first produced for sale in the state on or after January 1, 2028 … (c) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2028.” https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB853Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ny-raise/#d-ny-raise-office-reportrule:ny-raise-office-report:2028-01-01The state office starts a yearly report with anonymized, aggregated information about the critical safety incidents it reviewed. The law’s words: “7. (a) Beginning January first, two thousand twenty-eight, and annual- ly thereafter, the office shall produce a report” https://nyassembly.gov/leg/?bn=S08828&term=2025Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-notified-bodiesrule:eu-notified-bodies:2028-01-28Notified bodies already notified under the product laws in Annex I, Section A, must apply for designation under the AI Act. The law’s words: “such notified bodies which have been notified under the Union harmonisation legislation in Section A of Annex I, shall apply for designation in accordance with Section 4 of this Chapter by 28 January 2028.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2026/1744/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-high-risk-annex-irule:eu-high-risk-annex-i:2028-08-02The high-risk duties of Chapter III, Sections 1 to 3, apply to AI systems that are safety components of products under Annex I, such as medical devices and toys. The law’s words: “Chapter III, Sections 1, 2, and 3, with the exception of Article 6(5), shall apply from: … 2 August 2028 as regards AI systems classified as high-risk pursuant to Article 6(1) and Annex I” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2026/1744/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/ca-cata/#d-ca-cata-assistiverule:ca-cata-assistive:2029-01-01The exemption for generative AI systems designed mainly as assistive technology ends, and the Act applies to them. From this date the hidden disclosure must also state whether a system is made mainly as assistive technology, and the penalty for false assistive-technology claims ends. The law’s words: “(b) Before January 1, 2029, this chapter does not apply to a GenAI system that is designed to primarily function as assistive technology.” https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB1000Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/co-ai/#d-co-ai-cure-endsrule:co-ai-cure-ends:2030-01-01The Attorney General no longer must give 60 days' notice and a chance to cure before an enforcement action. The law’s words: “Before initiating an action before January 1, 2030, the attorney general must provide the developer or deployer with a 60-day notice and opportunity to cure the alleged violation, if a cure is deemed possible.” https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb26-189Tue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-public-authoritiesrule:eu-public-authorities:2030-08-02High-risk AI systems intended to be used by public authorities, and on the market before the high-risk duties applied, must comply. The law’s words: “In any case, the providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems intended to be used by public authorities shall take the necessary steps to comply with the requirements and obligations laid down in this Regulation by 2 August 2030.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2026/1744/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMThttps://jesseahawkins.com/rules/eu-ai-act/#d-eu-large-it-systemsrule:eu-large-it-systems:2030-12-31AI systems in the EU's large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (Annex X), placed on the market before 2 August 2027, must comply. The law’s words: “AI systems which are components of the large-scale IT systems established by the legal acts listed in Annex X that have been placed on the market or put into service before 2 August 2027 shall be brought into compliance with this Regulation by 31 December 2030.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/ojTue, 27 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT